Thompson v. Polynesian Hostel Beach Club

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii

Thompson v. Polynesian Hostel Beach Club

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I

JACOB THOMPSON, Case No. 22-cv-00070-DKW-WRP

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT POLYNESIAN HOSTEL BEACH PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR CLUB, et al., COSTS1

Defendants.

On February 22, 2022, Plaintiff Jacob Thompson, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against the Polynesian Hostel Beach Club and Shelly Doe,2 asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and State law. Dkt. No. 1. Thompson has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”). Dkt. No. 2. The IFP Application Federal courts can authorize the commencement of any suit without prepayment of fees or security by a person who submits an affidavit that demonstrates an inability to pay. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1). “[A] plaintiff

1Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. 2The Complaint states that Ms. Doe’s last name is unknown. Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 22. seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” Escobedo v. Applebees,

787 F.3d 1226, 1234

(9th Cir. 2015). While

Section 1915(a) does not require a litigant to demonstrate absolute destitution, Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.,

335 U.S. 331, 339

(1948), the applicant must nonetheless show that he is “unable to pay such fees or give security

therefor,”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a). In the IFP Application, although Thompson does not list an employer, he states that he receives $1,496 in take-home pay or wages. Dkt. No. 2 at 1. Thompson also states that, in the past 12 months, he has received social security

disability insurance, but does not state the amount of money he has received or whether he expects to receive the same in the future, even though the IFP Application specifically asks for that information. See

id.

As a result, the IFP

Application is incomplete, and the Court is unable to properly assess whether Thompson is able to pay the filing fee for this case. The IFP Application is, therefore, DENIED without prejudice. Should Thompson decide to continue with this action without paying the

filing fee, he must file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis, a blank copy of which the Court will mail to him. In completing a new application, Thompson must answer -al-l questions on the form, including the question

2 concerning the amount of disability insurance he has received in the last 12 months and whether he expects to receive such payments in the future. Thompson may have until March 17, 2022 to file a new application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs. The failure to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the civil filing fee

may result in the dismissal of this action without further consideration of the merits of the Complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Thompson a blank Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO 240). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2022 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.

"Rig oo Bok. 5 Beowog * /s/ Derrick K. Watson VP or Derrick K. Watson uy □□ United States District Judge vee erm eae

Thompson v. Polynesian Hostel Beach Club, et al.; Case No. 22-cv-00070-DK W-WRP; ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS

Reference

Status
Unknown