IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I

CARMELA LYNN JACKSON, Case No. 23-cv-64-DKW-WRP ROBERT CODY KIEFFER II, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, WITH PREJUDICE

vs.

GOOGLE, PAYPAL, FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, TIKTOK, et al.,

Defendants.

On February 2, 2023, Plaintiff Carmela Lynn Jackson, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against several social media websites and their executives. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”). As with several other complaints this Plaintiff has recently filed in this Court, the Complaint is indecipherable.1 It alleges the injecting and tracking of individuals through “bit frequencies” and the charging of “humans’ wires” as forms of “modern day slavery” with no evident connection to any of the named Defendants. Jackson also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. No. 3.

1See e.g., Jackson v. State of Indiana, et al., Civil No. 23-cv-00053-DKW-WRP, and Jackson v. Michael Jackson, the “Jackson 5”, et al., Civil No. 23-cv-00061-DKW-WRP. Plaintiff's unhinged allegations have no place in this Court, and nothing can be done to cure the Complaint’s deficiencies. See

(e)(2)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal,

(2009); Ashelman v. Pope,

(9th Cir. 1986) (citation omitted) (no opportunity to amend need be permitted where amendment would clearly be futile). The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, the IFP application is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk is instructed to CLOSE this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 7, 2023 at Honolulu, Hawat‘1.

/s/ Derrick K. Watson dot Derrick K. Watson Re Chief United States District Judge

Carmela Lynn Jackson, et al vs. Google, Paypal, et al; Civil No. 23-00064 DKW- WRP; ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE