Grace v. Smith
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Estate of Glover (Haw. 1962)
- Bishop v. Mahiko (Haw. 1940)
- In re a Submission on Agreed Facts in a Controversy Between Bishop & Mahiko (Haw. 1940)
- Notley v. Brown (Haw. 1905)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
The only question for determination on this submission on agreed facts is whether the plaintiffs, physicians and surgeons* are entitled to priority of payment for professional services rendered the decedent during his last illness, that is, priority over ordinary creditors.
We have no statute on the subject. In the absence of statute, the expenses of the last illness have no priority. 2 Woemer, Administration, Secs. 361, 364, 365; 8 Am. & Eng. Ehc. of Law, 2nd Ed. 1031. In most of the states such expenses by statute rank next after the expenses of administration, funeral expenses, and debts: to the Hnited States, and before ordinary-debts. This seems to be just, but it is for the legislature, not the courts, to so provide. Hnder the law we must hold that the plaintiffs’ claim should be paid pro rata with other ordinary claims, the estate of the decedent being insufficient to pay them all in full.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.