Davis v. King

Hawaii Supreme Court
Davis v. King, 16 Haw. 792 (Haw. 1905)
Bolt, Frear, Hartwell, Place, Wilder

Davis v. King

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam:

(1) The instrument is set forth in the complaint and sued on in haec verba and it is immaterial what the plaintiff called it, whether it was in fact a promissory note or not. (2) The complaint was made a part of the summons by reference, and there is no statute requiring the return endorsed on a summons issued by a district court to refer to the complaint as distinguished from the summons. The judgment below is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
R. W. Davis, in Error v. Mrs. J. A. King, in Error
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published