Hawaii Supreme Court, 1905

Davis v. King

Davis v. King
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided March 8, 1905 · Bolt, Frear, Hartwell, Place, Wilder
16 Haw. 792

Davis v. King

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam:

(1) The instrument is set forth in the complaint and sued on in haec verba and it is immaterial what the plaintiff called it, whether it was in fact a promissory note or not. (2) The complaint was made a part of the summons by reference, and there is no statute requiring the return endorsed on a summons issued by a district court to refer to the complaint as distinguished from the summons. The judgment below is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.