Hawaii Supreme Court, 1929

In Re Appeal of Bigelow

In Re Appeal of Bigelow
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided February 23, 1929 · Ouriam, Perry, Banks, Parsons
30 Haw. 907

In Re Appeal of Bigelow

Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam.

This is a petition for a rehearing. It is contended by Lyman H. Bigelow, superintendent of public works of the Territory of Hawaii, that in our original opinion we inadvertently failed to notice the provisions of certain sections of the Federal statutes. These sections did not escape our attention hut we thought they were without hearing upon the questions which we considered determinative of the case and therefore they were not mentioned in the opinion. We know of no reason why we should reach a different conclusion from that already announced.

The petition is denied, Avithout argument, under the rule.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.