Woodward v. Auyong
Woodward v. Auyong
34 Haw. 311; 1937 Haw. LEXIS 23
Woodward v. Auyong
Opinion of the Court
The motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss appellant’s bill of exceptions herein is denied under the *312 authorities of Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Limited, ante, p. 242, and De Mello v. Board of Water Supply, 33 Haw. 133.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.