Whittemore v. Farrington
Whittemore v. Farrington
Opinion of the Court
This is a petition for rehearing of the petition for writ of prohibition denied by this court in its opinion entered on May 19, 1955, as recorded ante, on page 52. The petition for rehearing constitutes a running comment on that opinion and is purely argumentative. It presents no new matter that has not been previously considered by the court. The cases cited therein have been read and they are deemed inapplicable. Section 9603, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1945, does not apply, this court having held that the trial judge ruled correctly on the motion for his disqualification.
Although not determinative in any way of the legal questions decided by this court in its opinion entered on May 19th, denying the petition for writ of prohibition, this
Petition denied without argument.
I do not concur, for reasons apparent in my dissenting opinion to the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition.
Frank A. McKinley (S)
Reference
- Full Case Name
- FRANCES FARRINGTON WHITTEMORE, RUTH FARRINGTON LEAVEY, EDMOND H. LEAVEY, JR., CATHARINE FARRINGTON HITE, JOAN WHITTEMORE CLOSE, CATHARINE ANDERSON LEAVEY, ALICE FARRINGTON LEAVEY, CHARLES HARRISON HITE, PATRICIA FARRINGTON HITE AND WALLACE RIDER FARRINGTON CLOSE v. ELIZABETH P. FARRINGTON, JOHN FARRINGTON, BEVERLY FARRINGTON RICHARDSON AND CALVIN C. McGREGOR, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, TERRITORY OF HAWAII
- Status
- Published