Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided May 16, 1960 · Cassidy, Lewis, Maeumoto, Tsukiyama, Wietz

44 Haw. 260

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Olokele Sugar Co. v. McCabe, Hamilton & Renny Co. (Haw. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam.

The petition for rehearing is granted. Argument will be had on June 30, 1960, at 9:00 A.M.

Counsel are directed to file briefs on the following questions:

(1) Under the facts presented in this case, and without consideration of R.L.H. 1955, Chapter 219, can appellee be allowed an attorney’s fee?

(2) If so, does such allowance constitute taxation of “costs” within the meaning of the first sentence of R.L.H. 1955, § 219-23?

Norman K. Ghung for respondent-appellant, City and County of Honolulu. Robert M. Rothwell for petitioner-appellee.

The Opening Brief shall be filed within 20 days, the Answering Brief within 35 days and the Reply Brief within 40 days from the date hereof.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.