Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Robinson (Haw. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On June 6, 1960, defendant-appellee filed a petition to reconsider the petition for rehearing denied May 31, 1960. Our rule limits the time for rehearing {Matter of Estate of Campbell, 40 Haw. 640), and the right to file the petition for reconsideration is questionable. See Lane v. Fern, 20 Haw. 318-319; Matter of Davis, 15 Haw. 724. Cf. You Goo Ho v. Ing, 43 Haw. 416.
The petition for rehearing was a reargument of points already considered, and was denied because we were not convinced of any need for further consideration. Lane v. Fern, supra; Territory v. Clark, 20 Haw. 405, 406; Robinson v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co., 20 Haw. 466, 467; Lum v. Stevens, 42 Haw. 352; Territory v. Aquino, 43 Haw. 415.
Notwithstanding the questionable status of this petition under our rules, we have examined it and are of the opinion that it is without merit.
Petition denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.