State v. Coney

Hawaii Supreme Court
State v. Coney, 46 Haw. 50 (Haw. 1962)
373 P.2d 903
Cassidy, King, Lewis, Mizuha, Monden, Place, Tashiro, Tsukiyama, Wirtz

State v. Coney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendants-appellants and the plaintiff-appellee have filed separate petitions for rehearing in the above-entitled canse.

The contentions set forth in the respective petitions have been carefully examined and considered. The court finds that the points presented are not new, having been fully briefed and argued by counsel and considered by this court in its decision.

The petitions are therefore denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF HAWAII, BY SHIRO KASHIWA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL (FORMERLY TERRITORY OF HAWAII, BY EDWARD N. SYLVA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL) v. GEORGE M. CONEY GERTRUDE FLORENCE CONEY MARTHA M. CONEY WILLIAM A. CONEY CLARISSA P. C. GERDES SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, LIMITED
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published