Hawaii Supreme Court, 1962

Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca

Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided October 12, 1962 · Cassidy, Hawkins, Hewitt, Jamieson, Lewis, Mizuha, Place, Tsukiyama, Wirtz
46 Haw. 126

Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing sets forth matters which have already been fully considered by the court. The “projected” Mendonca Estate lots were utilized under the evidence merely to determine the nature and extent of the benefit of access to the remaining lands of the Mendonca Estate as an entity and not as subdivided lots.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied without argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.