Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Hawaii Supreme Court, 1967

In re Robinson

In re Robinson
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided February 6, 1967 · Cassidy, Disposition, From, Having, Lewis, Merits, Mizuha, Original, Richardson, Wirtz
49 Haw. 574; 423 P.2d 437

In re Robinson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The right to file a second petition for rehearing after expiration of the time prescribed by Rule 5(a) of this court is questionable. See In the Matter of Davis, 15 Haw. 724; Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co., 44 Haw. 311, 353 P.2d 1016. At all events the petition is without merit and is denied.

Cassidy and Wirtz, JJ., having dissented from the majority in the original opinion, do not join in the disposition of the petition on the merits.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑