Rodrigues v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court
Rodrigues v. State, 52 Haw. 283 (Haw. 1970)
472 P.2d 509; 1970 Haw. LEXIS 122
Abe, Hawkins, Kobayashi, Laureta, Levinson, Marumoto, Place, Richardson

Rodrigues v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Guriam.

Movants (Plaintiffs-Appellees), ask this court to grant a rehearing for the sole purpose of permitting them to request this court to broaden its mandate to allow the court below, on remand, to consider an issue that was never ruled upon by the lower court and that *284was never heretofore raised in this appeal. Under Rule 3(b) (3), Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, this issue is not properly before this court, either on the appeal or on a petition for rehearing. State v. Kahua Ranch, 47 Haw. 466 (1964). Our ruling in Levy v. Kimball, 51 Haw. 540 (1970), urged in the motion, does not relieve movants from their failure to raise the issue.

Frank D. Padgett (Padgett, Greeley, Marumoto <& Akinaka of counsel) for the petition.

Motion denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
VINCENT E. RODRIGUES, JR. AND ADALINE RODRIGUES v. STATE OF HAWAII
Cited By
22 cases
Status
Published