Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. General Motors Corporation

Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided November 5, 1982 · Richardson, Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi

653 P.2d 96; 65 Haw. 428 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Zeller v. Cantu (Mass. 1985)
Zeller v. Cantu (Mass. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit between two joint tortfeasors where the plaintiff was found to be 5214% at fault and the defendants 4714% at fault. By entering judgment for the appellees, the court below held, in effect, that the Hawaii Comparative Negligence statute, § 663-31. HRS, governs this action and prevents appellant’s recovery since its fault, under the verdict, exceeded appellees’. We reverse.

We hold that § 663-31, HRS, does not affect an action between two joint tortfeasors under the Uniform Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act, §§ 663-11 through 17, HRS.

Accordingly, the judgment below is reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment in favor of the appellant in accor *429 dance with the provisions of the Uniform Contribution Amongjoint Tortfeasors Act.

Jeffrey Y. Higashi (Wayne M. Sakai with him on the reply brief, Burke, Ashford, Sakai, McPheeters, Bordner id Gilardy of counsel) for appellant. Joseph Schneider (Conklin, Schneider id Love of counsel) for appellees.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.