Hawaii Supreme Court, 2010

Gonsalves v. Frank

Gonsalves v. Frank
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided November 17, 2010

Gonsalves v. Frank

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-10-0000127 17-NOV-2010 03:15 PM

NO. SCPW-10-0000127 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RAYMOND GONSALVES, Petitioner, vs. CLAYTON FRANK, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Trader, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Raymond Gonsalves' petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to extraordinary relief. See HRS ยง 602-5(3) (2009) ("The supreme court shall have jurisdiction and power . . . [t]o exercise original jurisdiction in all questions . . . arising under writs of mandamus directed to public officers to compel them to fulfill the duties of their offices[.]โ€); Kema v. Gaddis, Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. The request to submit additional exhibits is also denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 17, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Rom A. Trader

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.