Gonsalves v. Frank

Hawaii Supreme Court

Gonsalves v. Frank

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-10-0000127

17-NOV-2010

03:15 PM

NO. SCPW-10-0000127

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RAYMOND GONSALVES, Petitioner,

vs.

CLAYTON FRANK, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Trader, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Raymond Gonsalves' petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to extraordinary relief. See HRS ยง 602-5(3) (2009) ("The supreme court shall have jurisdiction and power . . . [t]o exercise original jurisdiction in all questions . . . arising under writs of mandamus directed to public officers to compel them to fulfill the duties of their offices[.]โ€); Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. The request to submit additional exhibits is also denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 17, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Rom A. Trader

2

Reference

Status
Published