Hawaii Supreme Court, 2010

Tierney v. District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii

Tierney v. District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided November 3, 2010

Tierney v. District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-10-0000018 03-NOV-2010 08:40 AM NO. SCPW-10-0000018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIVIL NOS. 1SS09-1-0267, 1SS09-1-0268, 1SS09-1-0269, 1SS09-1-0470, and 1SS09-1-0471)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.

and Circuit Judge Garibaldi, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate

court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without

payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 3, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Colette Y. Garibaldi

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.