Hawaii Supreme Court, 2010

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided October 14, 2010

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 26517 14-OCT-2010 11:56 AM NO. 26517 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. RONALD G.S. AU, Respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------- IN RE APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF RONALD G.S. AU, Applicant.

(ODC 95-242-4701, 97-213-5407, 98-064-555) ORDER (By: Nakayama, J. for the court1) Upon review of Petitioner Ronald G.S. Au’s motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding 10 pages and his request to file a reply brief of 20 pages, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted.

Petitioner Au may file a reply brief that does not exceed 20 pages, exclusive of indexes, appendices, and statements of related cases.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 14, 2010.

FOR THE COURT: /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Associate Justice Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, J., Circuit Judge Crandall in place of Acoba, J., recused, Circuit Judge Trader in place of Duffy, J., recused, and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.