Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Opinion
LAW tsiaaAnY No§ 30664 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI%[ M1cHAEL c. T:ERNEY, Potitionor, vs. w _f HAwAI1 PARoL1NG AUTHoR1TY,iRoSponoont. ;; § §§
oRIG1NAL PRocEED1NG ORDER §(By: Duffy, J. for the~courtH Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the August l8, 2010 order denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, 1T is HEREBY oRDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. _ Honolulu, HawaiTq September 10, 2Q10.
FoR THE coURT: v”" @Lw;fm0M@@1Qw' Associate Justice DATED:
1 Considered by: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.