Hawaii Supreme Court, 2010

Freitas v. State

Freitas v. State
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided August 12, 2010

Freitas v. State

Opinion

NO. 29808 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAfI MELVIN FREITAS, JR., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant VS.

STATE oF HAWAI‘I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee '3’°' W 31 Snw@mz

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (S.P.P. NO. 09-1-OOlO; CR. NO. 95-lOO6) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Acoba, J., for the court1) ‘ lt appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court (Supp. . see HawaiYi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) of Appeals, 2009); see also Hawaifi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule (2009), 36(b)(1) lT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner- Appellant Melvin Freitas, Jr.'s application for writ of certiorari, filed August 9, 20l0, is dismissed without prejudice to re~filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.l(a) (“No later than 90 days after the filing of the intermediate court of judgment on appeal or dismissal order, any party may appeals’ Nakayama, Acting C.J., Ac0ba, and Circuit Judge Sakamoto, in place of Moon, The courts Recktenwald, JJ., Duffy, and ' C.J., recused. apply in writing to the supreme court for a writ of certiorari.”).

DATED: Melvin Freitas, appellant, pro se, application.

Jr., petitioner/petitioner- Honolulu, HawaFi, August l2, 20l0.

FOR THE COURTZ /9`°*"`“ Ass0ciate Justice

on the

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.