LAW L|BRARY NO. 30556 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

\/:NH v. NGUYEN, Petition@r, .§;,~'»~ vs. § § THE HONORABLE ERIC G. ROMANCHAK, JUDGE OF THE F §§ COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAlT§ _=wg .*b § 1 ;§ '“"F §§ ORlG1NAL PROCEEDING gi co (FC-D No. 05-1-0352) - ORDER Duffy, and Recktenwa1d, JJ.) (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Upon consideration of petitioner Vinh V. Nguyen's May 12, 2010 letter to the Chief Justice, which we treat as a petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner is See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawafi not entitled to mandamus relief. (A writ of mandamus is an 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly, IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate 2010 letter as a court shall process petitioner’s May 12, petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT 1S FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to seeking relief in the family court.

DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq Jun@ 15, 2g10_ Lu44p.La°T\mJLMuj¢Lyr£c /@""WY QQ»`LlLA@)&' now 5. /£¢¢c.¢~»~»(&/