LAW LTBRAF%Y

N0. 30429 :N THE sUPREME coURT or THE sTATE 0F HAwA;T F“*~?

M:cHAEL c. TIERNEY, Petiti@n@r, §§ sr vS. §§ % { , THE HoNoRABLE R1cHARD K. PERK1Ns, JUDGE or THE " r~ coURT or THE F:RsT cIRcU1T, sTATE or HAwAr:, R@_ §§ fn __ oR:G1NAL PRocEED:NG §§ <s.P.P. N@. 10-1-0018) oRDER and Recktenwald, JJ.)

Acoba, Duffy, Tierney's it (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, See Hawafi Rules of Penal _appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and Hawafi 200, indisputable right to relief.

Procedure, Rule 40(a) and (c)(2); Kema v. Gaddis, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (l999) (A writ of mandamus is an 204, extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or Therefore obtain the requested action.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Honolulu, Hawafi, May 4, 20lO.

DATED: PYow4nLY*7%MMUuj@J¥w /e-~§ %v~a>f. *()W@@[ %\ l mm ~’-‘- Ac¢z»¢¢/¢.M//M