NO. 3043O LAW LIBH’ARY lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THEtSTATE OF HAWAl‘l MICHAEL C. TlERNEY, PetitiOner, VS. ORlGlNAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 00-l-O377) ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C.

Tierney’s petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner's motion for return of property is pending in a civil action in which the non-hearing provision of Civil Administration Order 9-2 applies and the right Therefore, petitioner Gaddis, 9l (A writ of mandamus is confrontation does not apply. entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (l999) of is not Hawafi 200, all extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack obtain the requested action.). Accordingly, lT lS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for mandamus is denied. l DATED: Honolulu, HawaiTq May 4, 20l0. _of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or a writ of ¢W¢u4¢LLL“1v%Kau¢£u4~ /6*-~»~»§ @/¢w¢a.m@,g,, mm ¢~“- &pac.,.,.,.,v(¢/