Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Tierney v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Opinion
LAW izar»zARY
Petitioner, No. 30361 _” IN THE sUPREME coURT 0F int sTATE oF HAwA:Uf .o a »- *`»»::?
M:cHAEL c. T:ERNEY, §§ VS. EV=E HAWAII PAROLING AUTHORITY, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the March l7, 2010 order denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq March 30, 20l0.
Wvir- >z»»uu.C3>rw»¢u»1@u¥w. /6~»~< %m~oq_ £. 'Ql.¢€é$l %-\,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.