White v. Supreme Court of New Jersey
White v. Supreme Court of New Jersey
Opinion
N©. 3G379 IN THE SUPREME C©URT OF THE §TATE OF HAWAI` 'r'~'( MARY E. WHITE, ?etitiOner, \."S.
SUP:¢\EME cover or wm JERSP;Y ana CHIEF JUSTICE STUART RABNER, ReSpondent w~n¢u,~.~ wm ` <z ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER {By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Mary E. White’S petition for relief, it appears that we lack jurisdiction and power to grant the relief 3ought. _ee Hawai‘i ReviSed StatuteS § 602-5 (Supp. 2009). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is diSmiSSed.
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiHq March 23, 2010_ 1:¢»~»¢~. G`.`~rw,>¢..»z¢e¢.¢.»[ //Ez`\/“**r_\ 6;**-1,§§§;*~ 9§@-~€~»‘~`>»6»§<@»1%~ %4¢»»~¢//4<»6¢ c¢~../(//
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.