Monahn v. Cloninger
Monahn v. Cloninger
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER NO. 30004 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
oF THE sTATE oF HAwArI
LAURA MoNAHAN, plaintiff-Appel1ee, v. ": 23 vIvIANA cLoN:NcER and BRUcE cLAsPELL, Defendancs-Appe11an;§
APPEAL FRoM THE DIsTRIcT coURT 0F THE THIRD c:RduiT §§ (c:vIL No.»3Rc09-1-026H) ORDER DISMISSlNG APPEAL PURSUANT TO HRAP RULE 30 (By: Nakamura, C.J., Foley and Fujise, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that: (l) on August 5, 2009, Defendants-Appellants Vivian Cloninger and Bruce Glaspell (Appellants) filed a notice of appeal; (2) on October 5, 2009, the appellate clerk filed a notice of entering case on calendar and notified Appellants that the jurisdictional statement was due on October l5, 2009 and the opening brief was due on November l4, 2009; (3) Appellants did not file the jurisdictional statement or the opening brief; (4) on December 28, 2009, the appellate clerk informed Appellants: (a) the time for filing the jurisdictional statement and the opening brief had expired; (b) the matter would be called to the attention of the court on January 4, 2010 for such action as the court deemed proper; and (c) the appeal may be dismissed pursuant to HawaFi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 30; (5) Appellants did not file the jurisdictional statement or the opening brief; and (6) Appellants did not seek relief from default. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 30. b ` DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq February 24, 20lO. %»>v¢¢. %¢;,wal_ Chief Judge zéw£f@ " Associate Judge Associate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.