,Y,_.,¢~ NO. 29?6S §§ fm ”"‘”1 IN THE SUPREME C©SRT OF THE STATE OF HAWAlt §§ ; W>’»'vx.<; MlCHAEW C. TEERNKY, Petiticner, jm WH vs. §§ 0 -... orr

::LAY':@N FRAN:<, o:z:»;sc';:os, ntz>:iz~z‘ri»;fsn':? or or sAwA:‘:, r<@sp<>r~la¢~.:n ORIGINAL PRGCEEDING (CR. NO. 08»l*0369} ORDER Nakayama, Acoba, Duff and Recktenwald, JJ. i..ty, (By: Moon, C.J., Upon consideration of petitioner Michael F Tierney's ~» January 2”, 2010 “motion for release of prisoner pending disposition of application for habeas corpus,” it appears that petitioner’s April l5, 2009 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is not pending before the supreme court in the instant case inasmuch as the petition was disposed by the April Z2, 2009 order denying the petition without prejudice to seeking habeas corpus relief in the circuit court. The fac that petitioner subsequently sought and was denied habeas corpus relief in the circuit court did not reinstate petitioner’s April l5, 2009 petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the instant case.

Therefore, lT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “motion for release of prisoner pending disposition of application for habeas corpus” is The dismissal is without prejudice to seeking release dismissed.

08~l-0869 and pending appeal from the circuit court in Cr. No. pursuant to E§A??`E.`.D: i~~§c;r:»~">l.:.zfiii, ‘:Iawai.i, February l, 201.0.

YBL:‘..»<;¢¢ m 591 ."""f`-s?.h#'“~z‘;~r,,¢.} @;.i"\£¢» ‘//' F,<»»»»<»--'» »1‘1><»€@§€@~» //)’/Mw /@c¢¢c'&/»».»»/({