Tinao v. State
Tinao v. State
Opinion
NO. 3G263 m fn PATRlCK DAVlD TlNAO, Petition ma pm fW §§ §§ VS. STATE OF HAWAYI, Respondent. ORlGlNRL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.) Upon consideration of the papers submitted by Patrick David Tinao, it appears that the papers seek relief by way of a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus, but we are unable to 1 ascertain from the papers the basis for the relief sought. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the papers as a petition for a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT lS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus is dismissed. DATED: H<>n@iuiu, Hawai‘i, Jamlary 1_2, 2010_ W»/~»~ /@--\ Q§[email protected]&H4Q\'
Reference
- Status
- Published