MURASKO v. Loo
MURASKO v. Loo
258 P.3d 946
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
MURASKO v. Loo
Opinion
MATTHEW MURASKO, ALANE PODOLL and KYLE PODOLL, Petitioners,
v.
THE HONORABLE RHONDA I.L. LOO, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI`I; PAT CURELL and ROSINELI CURELL, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Hawaii.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, and DUFFY, JJ. and Circuit Judge NACINO, assigned by reason of vacancy.
Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration, filed on March 17, 2011 by respondents Pat Curell and Rosineli Curell, and the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.