Hawaii Supreme Court, 2012

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided October 2, 2012

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000713 02-OCT-2012 08:15 AM NO. SCAD-12-0000713

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

ROBERT D. KAWAMURA, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 07-034-8494)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, the stipulated facts, and the evidence in the record, it appears Respondent Robert D. Kawamura neglected a client matter for nineteen months, to the potential injury of the client’s claim, in violation of Rules 1.3 and 8.4(a) of the Hawai'i Rules of Professional Conduct. It further appears that Respondent Kawamura cooperated fully with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) in its investigation and disciplinary proceedings, but that the investigation and disciplinary proceedings were delayed for a period in excess of four years through no fault of Respondent Kawamura’s. It further appears Respondent Kawamura has a

heretofore unblemished disciplinary record and has expressed

remorse for his actions. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Robert D. Kawamura is publicly censured, pursuant to Rule 2.3(a)(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Kawamura shall

pay all costs of the proceedings, as approved upon a timely

submission of a bill of costs, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 2, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.