Ah Sing v. Nacino

Hawaii Supreme Court

Ah Sing v. Nacino

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000700

23-AUG-2012

01:06 PM

NO. SCPW-12-0000700

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

CEDRIC AH SING, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE EDWIN C. NACINO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT

COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIV. NO. 1CC12-1-000496; CR. NO. 56581)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Cedric Ah Sing’s August 8, 2012 petition for a writ of mandamus, the papers in support and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 23, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

2

Reference

Status
Published