Oamilda v. 2011 Council Reapportionment Commission
Oamilda v. 2011 Council Reapportionment Commission
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000058 10-FEB-2012 11:38 AM
NO. SCPW-12-0000058
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
GLEN OAMILDA, Petitioner,
vs.
2011 COUNCIL REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION and 2011 STATE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
AMENDED ORDER1 (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
mandamus filed by petitioner Glen Oamilda, it appears that: (1)
Revised Ordinances of Honolulu, article III, section 3-103 does
not require that communities remain undivided in the
reapportionment of council districts; see Kawamoto v. Okata, 75 Haw. 463, 468-69, 868 P.2d 1183, 1186 (1994); (2) article III,
section 3-103 does not require that council districts be drawn on
a permanent resident population base; and (3) petitioner's
assertions that the Council Reapportionment Commission did not
The amendment corrects the February 9, 2012 order that misspelled petitioner's first name as Glenn. follow lawful process are not supported by any evidence.
Consequently, petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.).
It further appears that: (1) petitioner's challenge to the 2011 Final Reapportionment Plan for the State Legislature is untimely; see Hawai'i Constitution, article IV, section 10; and (2) the 2011 Final Reapportionment Plan for the State Legislature
was invalidated on January 4, 2012. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is: (1) denied as to relief against the 2011 Council
Reapportionment Commission and (2) dismissed as to relief against
the 2011 State Reapportionment Commission.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 10, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.