Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0002165 22-JUL-2013 10:59 AM
SCPW-13-0002165
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STEVEN R. SCHAEFER, Petitioner,
vs.
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the June 22, 2013 letter from Steven R. Schaefer, it appears that Mr. Schaefer is seeking review of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s consideration of the complaint Mr. Schaefer filed against attorneys Hayden Aluli and Mimi Desjardins. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall file the June 22, 2013 letter as a petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 22, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Reference
- Status
- Published