Wideman v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Wideman v. Hawaii Paroling Authority
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000065 08-NOV-2013 09:01 AM
SCWC-13-0000065
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
LONNELL REGINALD WIDEMAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
HAWAI'I PAROLING AUTHORITY, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000065 AND CAAP-13-0000111)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was
filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed November 4,
2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate
court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless
the time for filing the application is extended in accordance
with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 8, 2013.
Lonnell Reginald Wideman, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.