Wideman v. Hawaii Paroling Authority

Hawaii Supreme Court

Wideman v. Hawaii Paroling Authority

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000065

08-NOV-2013

09:01 AM

SCWC-13-0000065

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

LONNELL REGINALD WIDEMAN,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

HAWAI'I PAROLING AUTHORITY,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0000065 AND CAAP-13-0000111)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above- referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner­ Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed November 4, 2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 8, 2013. Lonnell Reginald Wideman, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

2

Reference

Status
Published