Hawaii Supreme Court, 2013

Tierney v. County of Hawaii

Tierney v. County of Hawaii
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided May 23, 2013

Tierney v. County of Hawaii

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000616 23-MAY-2013 01:01 PM

SCPW-13-0000616 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner, vs. COUNTY OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civ. No. 00-1-377) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on May 2, 2013, the documents submitted in support thereof and attached thereto and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the $5,000.

Moreover, petitioner can seek relief, as appropriate, in the circuit court. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 23, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.