Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ng
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000414 18-MAR-2013 01:50 PM SCAD-12-0000414 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. WING C. NG, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 09-002-8725) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Ginoza, assigned by reason of vacancy) On March 8, 2013, Respondent Wing C. Ng filed with this court a document entitled “Request for Reconsideration; Request for Clarification; Previous Reply to ODC.” Though Respondent Ng fails to cite to any authority for the filing, we deem it a motion for reconsideration, timely made pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 18, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.