Hawaii Supreme Court, 2014

Dacanay v. Sakamoto

Dacanay v. Sakamoto
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided May 1, 2014

Dacanay v. Sakamoto

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0004663 01-MAY-2014 01:25 PM

SCPW-13-0004663 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

FELIX DACANAY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS and THE GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Petitioners, vs. HONORABLE KARL K. SAKAMOTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge, and CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I and IMELDA MARCOS AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCOS and IMELDA MARCOS, INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 88-0522-02) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioners Felix Dacanay, as personal representative of the Estate of Roger Roxas, and The Golden Budha Corporation’s petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition, filed on October 29, 2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they do not have alternative means of seeking the requested relief.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition is denied without prejudice.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.