State v. Canosa
State v. Canosa
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0001051 17-JUN-2014 01:44 PM
SCWC-11-0001051 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. STANLEY CANOSA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0001051; CR. NO. 09-1-1524) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stanley Canosa’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 6, 2014, is
hereby rejected.1
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 17, 2014.
Emmanuel V. Tipon /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Sonja P. McCullen for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Upon retrial, the trial court may consider the appropriateness of an “inference” instruction. See State v. Steger, 114 Hawai'i 162, 171 n.18, 158 P.3d 280, 289 n.18 (2006); State v. Matafeo, 71 Haw. 183, 189, 787 P.2d 671, 674 (1990) (Wakatsuki, J., concurring); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 59-60 (1988) (Stevens, J., concurring).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.