Retutal v. Retutal

Hawaii Supreme Court

Retutal v. Retutal

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-10-0000126

22-SEP-2014

01:34 PM

SCWC-10-0000126

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I _________________________________________________________________

JAMES LAURETA RETUTAL, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SARAH KAMAILE RETUTAL, now known as Hatori,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-10-0000126; FC-D NO. 09-1-1130)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above- referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed September 16, 2014, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 22, 2014. Scot Stuart Brower /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2

Reference

Status
Published