Hawaii Supreme Court, 2014

Tagupa v. VIPDESK

Tagupa v. VIPDESK
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided December 11, 2014

Tagupa v. VIPDESK

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0002084 11-DEC-2014 02:32 PM

SCWC-13-0002084

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

LOTTIE TAGUPA, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

VIPDESK Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0002084; CIV. NO. 3RC12-1-297H)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Lottie Tagupa’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 30, 2014, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 11, 2014.

Lottie Tagupa /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Robert D. Triantos and Edmund W.K. Haitsuka /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.