Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0001296 18-MAR-2015 11:57 AM

SCPW-14-0001296

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

CATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC., aka MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE EDWIN C. NACINO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent Judge,

and

JOHN ROE 2; SOCIETY OF THE PRIESTS OF SAINT SULPICE a/k/a THE ASSOCIATED SULPICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.; and ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 12-1-1637-06)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Catholic Foreign

Mission Society of America, Inc., aka Maryknoll Fathers and

Brothers’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on November

12, 2014, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support

thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner fails to

demonstrate that, under the specific facts and circumstances of this matter and the terms of the protective order, disclosure of the requested documents pursuant to the protective order issued by the Discovery Master violates article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is meant to restrain a judge of an inferior court who has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty to act). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2015.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson