Florer v. Kuriyama
Florer v. Kuriyama
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-15-0000500
06-AUG-2015
10:09 AM
SCPW-15-0000500
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DENNIS FLORER, Petitioner,
vs. THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE KURIYAMA, JUDGE OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CR. NO. 14-1-0229)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner Dennis Florer’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on July 2, 2015, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. A writ of mandamus is, therefore, not warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 6, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
2
Reference
- Status
- Published