Hawaii Supreme Court, 2016

Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village

Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided May 27, 2016

Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000011 27-MAY-2016 08:12 AM

SCWC-16-0000011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

RAEVYN WAIKIKI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

vs.

HO'OMAKA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

VIOLET JHUN, Petitioner/Defendant-Cross-Claim Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

WADE KIOSHI KALEOLANI SHIMOJO, Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000011; CIV. NO. 13-1-2391-09)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner Violet Jhun’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 14, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 27, 2016.

Walter R. Schoettle /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner Violet Jhun /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, and Janice D. Heidt /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent Wade Kioshi /s/ Richard W. Pollack Kaleolani Shimojo /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.