Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village
Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-16-0000011
27-MAY-2016
08:12 AM
SCWC-16-0000011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
RAEVYN WAIKIKI,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
vs.
HO'OMAKA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS,
Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
VIOLET JHUN,
Petitioner/Defendant-Cross-Claim Defendant-Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
WADE KIOSHI KALEOLANI SHIMOJO,
Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-16-0000011; CIV. NO. 13-1-2391-09)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner Violet Jhun’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 14, 2016, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 27, 2016. Walter R. Schoettle
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner Violet Jhun
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, and Janice D. Heidt /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent Wade Kioshi /s/ Richard W. Pollack Kaleolani Shimojo
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
2
Reference
- Status
- Published