Phan v. Bissen

Hawaii Supreme Court

Phan v. Bissen

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-17-0000657

26-SEP-2017

07:58 AM

SCPW-17-0000657

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

HAU PHAN, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE RICHARD T. BISSEN, JR., Judge of the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 2FC16-1-000394(4))

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Hau Phan’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on September 9, 2017, and the record, it appears that petitioner has filed an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence in the Intermediate Court of Appeals in CAAP-17-0000542 and, therefore, may seek relief in accordance to HRAP Rule 9(b), as appropriate. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested mandamus relief from this court. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 26, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2

Reference

Status
Published