Hawaii Supreme Court, 2019

Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.

Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided June 20, 2019

Vicente v. Hilo Medical Investors, Ltd.

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000502 20-JUN-2019 09:06 AM

SCWC-18-0000502 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DWIGHT J. VICENTE, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant-Appellant, vs. HILO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LTD., Respondent/Employer-Appellee-Appellee, and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY/AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee, and JOHN MULLEN & COMPANY, INC., Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-18-0000502; CASE NO. AB 2015-259(H)(S); DCD NO. 1-87-00882) ORDER DENYING “MOTION TO RECONSIDER” (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

On June 12, 2019, petitioner/claimant-appellant Dwight J.

Vicente filed a “Motion to Reconsider,” in which he asks this court to reconsider the June 5, 2019 order rejecting his application for writ of certiorari. A rejection of an application for writ of certiorari, however, is not subject to reconsideration. See HRAP Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court.

The rejection of an application for certiorari shall be final.”).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Motion to Reconsider” is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 20, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.