Hawaii Supreme Court, 2020

Slavick v. State

Slavick v. State
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided June 23, 2020

Slavick v. State

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 23-JUN-2020 08:38 AM

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRISTOPHER LEE SLAVICK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher Lee Slavick’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on June 1, 2020, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief or that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 23, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.