Hawaii Supreme Court, 2021

In re: Slavick

In re: Slavick
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided January 7, 2021

In re: Slavick

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JAN-2021 12:23 PM Dkt. 8 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Slavick’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on December 28, 2020, it appears that, based on the record before this court, petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief and that he lacks alternative means to seek relief.

Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 7, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.