Hawaii Supreme Court, 2021

Lake v. Chang

Lake v. Chang
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided October 12, 2021

Lake v. Chang

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 12-OCT-2021 10:59 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MARCUS PONO LAKE, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the registered holder of Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-HE7 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7; VIOLA INNOCENCIA FAO; LANIKUHANA PATIO HOMES; 1326 KEEAUMOKU LLC; MILILANI TOWN ASSOCIATION; STEPHEN W. FISHER, individually and as Trustee for the Stephen W. Fischer Revocable Trust; REALTY PROFESSIONALS LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company; and JRS HUI, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 1CC151001975) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Marcus Lake’s petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, on September 28, 2021, the circuit court entered an “Order Denying ‘Defendant, Crossclaim Plaintiff, and Third-Party Plaintiff Marcus Pono Lake’s Motion for Summary Judgment’ Filed on March 14, 2019,” thereby ruling on petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, which is the subject of the petition. The relief that petitioner seeks in the petition has been addressed by the circuit court’s order and, thus, the requested extraordinary writ is not necessary. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 12, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.