Friddle v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court

Friddle v. State

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

18-NOV-2021

10:13 AM

Dkt. 7 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DANNY FRIDDLE, Petitioner,

vs.

CLERK OF THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT,

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

On October 25, 2021, petitioner Danny Friddle filed an application for writ of mandamus directing the clerk of the family court of the first circuit to file his Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure (“HRPP”) Rule 40 petition for post-conviction relief. The same day the application for writ of mandamus was filed, the circuit court filed petitioner’s HRPP Rule 40 petition in Case No. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX. Petitioner has obtained the relief he seeks in this original proceeding. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the application for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the application for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fees.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 18, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2

Reference

Status
Published