Aldan v. Guidry

Hawaii Supreme Court

Aldan v. Guidry

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

16-OCT-2023

09:49 AM

Dkt. 24 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

MIKA ALDAN also known as MIKA TAN,

Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY,

Associate Judge of the Intermediate Court of Appeals,

State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX; 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

Circuit Judge Cataldo and Circuit Judge Hamman,

assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of the August 21, 2023, August 25, 2023, and September 21, 2023 submissions from Petitioner Mika Aldan also known as Mika Tan, filed with this court as a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the record in 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX, 1CPC-21- 0000816, and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, we conclude the petitioner is neither Sean Aldan’s counsel nor a party to the underlying cases and further that she fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 21(a); Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi, 81 Hawaiʻi 410, 414, 917 P.2d 1284, 1288 (1996). Therefore,

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 16, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo

/s/ Kirstin M. Hamman

2

Reference

Status
Published