Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023

Esekia v. Castagnetti

Esekia v. Castagnetti
Hawaii Supreme Court · Decided November 17, 2023
Esekia v. Castagnetti

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 17-NOV-2023 01:05 PM Dkt. 6 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________ FALEUPOLU ESEKIA, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE JEANNETTE H. CASTAGNETTI, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge, and PUU HELEAKALA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, by and through its Board of Directors, ALAPATI ESEKIA, PHKK PROPERTIES LLC, a Company or Corporation, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2007 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, Respondents. ________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Johnson and Circuit Judge Tonaki, assigned by reason of vacancies) Upon consideration of the documents filed on October 13, 2023, which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, a writ of mandamus is not intended to be used to supersede the circuit court’s discretion when ruling on pending matters before it, nor be used in lieu of normal appellate procedures. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999). An extraordinary writ is not warranted.

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 17, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Ronald G. Johnson /s/ John M. Tonaki

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.